Stay Informed

Factsheet: Current Status of Iran's Nuclear and Ballistic Missile Programs

EmailPrint

by Kingston Reif [contact information]

August 17, 2009

Download a one page PDF summary of this analysis

Iran’s Nuclear and Ballistic Missile Programs Remain Shrouded in Secrecy

-- Iran has committed numerous violations of its International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards obligations.

-- IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei noted in a June 2008 interview that the Iranians “continue to insist that they are interested solely in using nuclear power for civilian purposes. We have yet to find a smoking gun that would prove them wrong. But there are suspicious circumstances and unsettling questions.”[1]

-- Iran’s lack of transparency is exacerbated by its refusal to abide by the Additional Protocol, which grants the IAEA far more intrusive rights of access to suspected nuclear-related information and sites. As the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) notes, “without the Additional Protocol and in some cases additional transparency measures in place, the IAEA cannot provide adequate assurances that a country’s nuclear program is purely civilian in nature.”[2]

-- According to the latest IAEA report on Iran dated June 5, 2009, Iran continues to:

  1. deny the Agency access to the heavy water reactor under construction at Arak;
  2. refuse to give the Agency preliminary design information for the planned reactor that is to be built in Darkhovin;
  3. refuse to suspend its enrichment related activities or its work on heavy water related projects as required by the UN Security Council;
  4. refuse to cooperate with the Agency concerning the possibility of military dimensions to Iran’s nuclear program. [3]

    Estimates of the Status of Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Programs

    -- Iran does not currently possess a nuclear weapon of any kind.

    -- There is no evidence that Iran has made the political decision to develop a nuclear weapon. In order to develop a nuclear device, Iran would have to either remove IAEA safeguards from its enrichment facility at Natanz and its heavy water reactor at Arak (once it is completed), or produce fissile material and develop a bomb in secret. The IAEA continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran. There is no evidence that Iran has conducted a nuclear test or is currently developing secret nuclear facilities. However, so long as Iran continues to refuse to adhere to the Additional Protocol, there is no way to know for sure that its program is purely civilian in nature.

    -- In the event that Iran makes the political decision to develop a nuclear weapon, the weight of the evidence suggests that Iran will not possess a nuclear-armed ballistic missile capable of threatening all of Europe and/or the United States for years to come.

    All These Estimates Are Exactly That - Estimates

    -- There is no hard consensus as to exactly how close Iran is to acquiring a nuclear weapon, fitting a nuclear warhead on a ballistic missile, and/or developing a ballistic missile capable of reaching most of Europe and the United States.

    Notes

    1. Quoted in Paul Kerr, “Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status,” Congressional Research Service (November 20, 2008), pg. 4.

    2. David Albright and Jacqueline Shire et al., “Nuclear Iran: Not Inevitable,” Institute for Science and International Security (January 21, 2009), pg. 13.

    3. Report by the Director General, “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council Resolutions 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008) and 1835 (2008) in the Islamic Republic of Iran,” IAEA Board of Governors (June 5, 2009).

    4. Albright and Shire, “Misconceptions about Iran’s Nuclear Program,” Institute for Science and International Security (July 8, 2009).

    5. James Hider, Richard Beeston, and Michael Evans, “Iran Is Ready to Build an N-Bomb – It Is Just Waiting for the Ayatollah’s Order,” The London Times (August 3, 2009).

    6. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, “Iran: Nuclear Capabilities and Intentions,” (November 2007).

    7. Steven Aftergood, “An Updated Intelligence Review from the DNI,” Secrecy News (August 6, 2009).

    8. The EastWest Institute, “Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Potential: A Joint Threat Assessment by U.S. and Russian Technical Experts,” (May 2009), pg. 5.

    9. Ibid., pg. 9.

    10. See Steven Hildreth, “Iran’s Ballistic Missile Programs: An Overview,” Congressional Research Service (February 4, 2009), pg. 2.

    11. See Global Security Newswire, “Iran Could Put U.S. in Missile Range by 2015, Air Force Report Warns,” (June 10, 2009).

    12. The EastWest Institute, op. cit., pg. 12.

    Kingston Reif 202-546-0795 ext. 2103 kreif@armscontrolcenter.org

    Kingston Reif is the Deputy Director of Nuclear Non-Proliferation at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, where his work focuses on arms control, nuclear nonproliferation, nuclear weapons, and preventing nuclear terrorism. He has published letters and articles on nuclear weapons policy in such venues as the Washington Post, Washington Times, Wall Street Journal, Survival, Defense News, and Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.